An anonymous reader writes
"A very recent paper in the prestigious biology journal Cell ? 'Human Embryonic Stem Cells Derived by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer' (openly accessible) ? reports the novel creation of human embryonic stem cells from somatic nuclei. It has received massive media coverage and is surely penciled in as a strong candidate for scientific publication of the year. It does however have several examples of image reuse that have been pointed out by a submission on PubPeer. In the paper, it is recorded that the journal Cell accepted this paper just 4 days after submission. Perhaps, under the circumstances, the pre-publication peer review had to be a little hasty? At least at PubPeer, while conducting post publication review, we can take as long as necessary to make up for that lost time. 'In 2004 scientists led by Woo Suk Hwang of Seoul National University claimed to have produced human embryonic stem cells through the same technique used by the Oregon team. Their paper, published in Science, turned out to contain fabricated data. That came to light when scientists figured out that some of the images in the paper were copied or manipulated.''"Source: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdotScience/~3/rtR8Ikibizo/story01.htm
the replacements how to hard boil eggs new nfl uniforms derbyshire the matrix oceans 11 ferris state hockey
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন